Man-of-Steel-movie-PosterRelease Date: June 14, 2013 (3D/2D theaters and IMAX 3D) 
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures 
Director: Zack Snyder 
Screenwriter: David S. Goyer 
Starring: Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, Michael Shannon, Kevin Costner, Diane Lane, Laurence Fishburne, Antje Traue, Ayelet Zurer, Christopher Meloni, Russell Crowe, Michael Kelly, Harry Lennix, Richard Schiff 
Genre: Action, Adventure 
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for intense sequences of sci-fi violence, action and destruction, and for some language) 
Official Website: ManofSteel.WarnerBros.com

Under the guidance of Christopher Nolan, Zack Snyder breaths new life into Superman’s legacy – implementing a darker and more realistic origin story for Earth-raised alien from Krypton.  Man of Steel is an exceptionally ambitious retelling of Superman’s beginnings, combining both substance and visuals into into one complete package of super-goodness. For this reviewer, Man of Steel is the answer to the regime of super-films that’s paraded around an assumed idea – that Superman could only bear bright colors and maintain the corny persona that was instilled by the Richard Donner days of Superman.  I love the old films, as well as Superman Returns, but Man of Steel was a neccesary reboot to a franchise that’s never served the image of Superman properly.

Man-of-steel-1

It’s an all-to-familiar origin – Jor-El and Lara send their son, Kal-El, away from Krypton moments before Krypton’s destruction.  General Zod, while loyal to the preservation of Krypton and the people, is sentenced to the Phantom Zone along with his militaristic band for treachery and murder.  With a few twists here and there, and changing up how the characters take part in the story, it all leads to the well known outcome – where a hero makes a stance to fight for truth, justice, and the American way.  How Clark gets to that point in his life, however, is what makes this movie stand out.

Imagine yourself growing up thinking you were like every one else.  Then one day you’re thrown a curve ball that negates everything you know.  Your body develops abilities that defy nature (or at least nature as we know it) and makes you different amongst your peers.  How does one cope with such drastic changes as a fourth grader?  Luckily Clark had a set of Earth parents that help him through the changes, while teaching him to keep his feet planted firmly on the ground.

Man-of-steel-3

Hiding, Clark Kent goes from place to place, constantly changing his identity and keeping himself a secret from the world – at least until a time where the world, and himself, were ready for the reveal. It isn’t until adulthood when Clark learns of his birthright and heritage, and actually puts on the super suit. So it should as no surprise when, despite his patience in learning to control his abilities, he’s still a little unpracticed in the art fighting. So we journey along with Clark as he tries to find his place amongst Earthlings, remaining in a state of limbo and uncertainty until the very moment where he fights to protect Earth from total annihilation.  By the film’s end we see the beginnings of a hero and cultural icon of which I’m looking forward seeing unfold in sequels to come.

Of course the biggest pre-conceived complaint from fans was the attempt at giving Superman a darker origin, resembling too much of Nolan’s Dark Knight trilogy in terms of brooding gothic sensibilities. While there’s no denying, with Nolan in the Producer’s chair, Man of Steel has a darker undertone in comparison to its cinematic predecessors, it’s still no where near on par with Batman’s sinister motif. Hope still remains as the driving theme, Snyder simply gave Superman a more respectable and serious cinematic tone.  Where Man of Steel REALLY reflects Nolan’s Bat-verse is in the ambiguity and inner conflict, which completely negates high spirited and witty take on the Marvel movies.  Is it possible that the DC movies are simply not served well in the same vain as the Marvel movies?  Giving characters like Batman and Superman a more serious tone might just be what the doctor ordered for the DC cinematic universe.  DC movies simply haven’t been treated well until Nolan and Snyder took their knife and scalpel and reassessed how to make Superhero movies. Maybe their on to something? Green Lantern could have certainly used a bit of the edgier and darker touch.

Man-of-steel-4

Calling upon the past films, Pa Kent lets Clark know he was sent to Earth for a reason.  Jor-El send a different message, however, in the form of a very elegant holographic projection – that he should use his powers to “lead humanity” to greater things. It’s these two opposing viewpoints from his fatherly figures which creates enough tension for Clark to fight with and balance, ultimately forcing him to make a decision that’s almost out of character for the Superman we’re all familiar with. Without spoiling anything, while it pains Superman to have had to make that choice, it was a neccesary decision in the heat of the moment.

Going beyond the more substantial aspect, the visuals and action was an amazing spectacle worthy of a Superman film.  The powers of Kryptonians exposed to a yellow sun packed a mega punch that might be one of the most effective portrayals of super powers on the big screen.  The world of Krypton is masterfully created, with architecture that goes beyond what anyone could have imagined, yet fits perfectly within the Superman mythos.  And I’ll be surprised if you don’t walk out of that theater thoroughly impressed with the Kryptonian garb.  I, for one, hope to own a Kryptonian battle suit one day.

Man-of-steel-2

The cast was flawless.  Amy Adams showed herself to be the best incarnation of Lois Lane, even better than Erica Durance.  Kevin Costner proves to be a better actor in his old age as Pa Kent, as well as Diane Lane acting as a perfect mother to Clark.  It was nice to see Richard Schiff play a much more positive character as Dr. Emil Hamilton, and Laurence Fishburne played a strong version of Perry White in one of his better roles as a minor character.

Michael Shannon was great as Zod, even though he sometimes felt like a kid yelling at the adults because he didn’t get his way.  But maybe that was what he going for. In any case, it was a commanding performance and no one could ask for better.  Henry Cavill was perfect as Superman. Much in the same way Daniel Craig was with James Bond, Cavill brought both intelligence and physic to the role of Superman.  His presence and confidence amongst the military leaders and strong willed humans was exceptional, and his physical self resembled the comics so much more.  (Yeah, I can be a source material snob too.)

Man-of-steel-5

A few things that made me giggle were the obvious product placement.  Amongst all the rubble, debris, and property damage, Sears remained unaffected and standing firm.  While I believe the writing of the basic plot to be exceptional, there were moments of poor dialog execution.  The actors did all they could with the lines they were given, and handled them quite well in fact, but  David S. Goyer has proven himself to be a better screenplay writer than that.

I do wish we could have gotten to know a few characters better, and the relationship between Superman and Lois could have been handled a little more fluidly, which makes for slight bumps along the way.  And like any science fiction/action movie, plot holes bounce up left and right, and you’ll undoubtedly find yourself asking, “wait, what about this?”  But these aren’t significant distractions and only detract from the overall enjoyment of the film minimally.

Man-of-steel-7

Ever since X-Men changed how Superhero movies were made, I’ve been hoping for a GOOD Superman movie.  One that gave Superman a more respectable image amongst comic fans and non-comic fans everywhere.  75 years ago Siegel and Shuster created a hero that made us believe a man could fly, soaring to heights that the two creators could only dream of.  Superman has evolved into something spectacular, and I’ve been along for the ride ever since I began reading comics in 1992.  Am I a bit biased in proclaiming Man of Steel to be the best Superhero movie thus far?  Certainly.  But without a doubt this film has given Superman a better image to the Superman mythos.  And I for one will be anxiously awaiting Snyder’s return as director for the next Superman adventure.

8 out of 10 stars

Superman-unchained-1-coverWritten by: Scott Snyder
Art by: Jim Lee, Scott Williams
Backup Art by: Dustin Nguyen
Cover by: Jim Lee
Variant Cover by: Jim Lee, Scott Williams
Color/B&W: Color
Page Count: 32
U.S. Price: 4.99
On Sale Date: Jun 12 2013

Who knew reporters had the power to move, place, and alter a newspaper’s layout?  Lois Lane certainly shows how much influence she has on the Daily Planet’s ad placement and payment plan based on her futuristic publishing program.  Does any of this reflect reality?  Nah.  But it’s a good gimmick to show how bad ass Lois Lane truly is.

Jimmy Olsen is as helpful as ever, still only getting bagels and coffee for the news reporting team of Clark Kent and Lois Lane, and sporting  quite the get-up too.  And Lex Luthor is only a suspect in the grand scheme of the main plot.  Who’s behind the weaponized falling objects coming to Earth?  All clues point to a terrorist organization called Ascension, but by the book’s end we learn the perpetrator is someone close to Lois Lane.

And I thought DC Comics finally came to its senses when Grant Morrison left Action Comics, putting Superman in a place where he’d finally become the way he SHOULD be.  I stand corrected.  Scott Snyder delivers a Superman story that’s as good as it could have been.  Of course I’m not sure why the title of this comic is “unchained.”  Supes doesn’t show any sign of being edgier than normal, but rather shows himself as being a caring alien who’s loyalty to truth and justice all go hand-in-hand with his might.

With the name of Scott Snyder and Jim Lee come an assumed quality based on their past work.  Their reputations are enough to sell a book.  So why does DC find it neccesary to create poster sized page fold-outs as a sales gimmick?  Typically when comics come with posters inside of them meant to be taken out, I remove them, discard them, and never think about them again.  However, this fold out isn’t meant to be removed or hung up on your wall. Rather, it’s meant to be unfolded and remain a permanent part of the book as it connects to the rest of the story.  Not that you couldn’t do without it if you really wanted to hang it up, it’s a gorgeous piece of artwork…it’s just annoying that DC decided to do it anyway simply to jack up the dollar amount.

This book presents Superman as more than a muscle bound hero – Superman does research!  He knows about Luthor and his literary works, which is why he came to the conclusion that Luthor was behind the evil plot.  Knowledge leads to logical conclusions!  Not something Superman is known for, and it’s a refreshing personality trait Snyder infuses into the Man of Steel.  (Speaking of which, the movie comes out this weekend! #shamelessplug) It’s the wrong conclusion of course because every mystery has to have a twist, but it’s still wonderful to see Supes with some above average intelligence.

Jim Lee is always great, but he does tend to go over the top with his monsters doesn’t he?  Their aren’t any monsters in this issue, but the “REAL” Superman, as Sam Lane puts it, is quite mounter-like…

real-superman

But that’s only a minor complaint and doesn’t really affect my enjoyment of the overall book.  Superman looks great on every page, the action scenes are superb, and he’s great at giving even the most subtle and calming scenes an appropriate amount of emotional visual depth.

I always love it when Superman is given a new twist on his powers, or when we learn something new about Superman that we assumed wouldn’t change.  Superman, while not necessarily being unchained in the way the title means it, is something slightly new an refreshing.  How often can we say that about multiple titles involving the same main hero?  Batman, Spider-Man, and even Superman.  All their respective titles don’t hold up to the name.  Superman Unchained does show potential in giving us a Superman title which has the potential of being very different from the other Super books.  And I look forward to what this title, and Scott Snyder, can bring to the table.

9 out of 10 stars

Green Lantern 21 coverWritten by: Robert Venditti
Art by: Billy Tan
Cover by: Billy Tan
Variant Cover by: Rags Morales
Color/B&W: Color
Page Count: 32
U.S. Price: 2.99
On Sale Date: Jun 5 2013

Just under a  decade of a Geoff Johns run Green Lantern universe and I feel a little uncertain of everything.  It’s difficult when every other title in comics fluctuates writers so frequently, where as Green Lantern remained steady with Johns at the helm.  It sounds ridiculous, but when I read the final issue of Green Lantern with Geoff as the writer two weeks ago, I wasn’t sure I was ready for the change.  That being said, it was obvious Johns was getting fatigued and needed to depart from the title for an extended period.  Robert Venditti is a name I don’t really care about, nor is it a name that commands anything as powerful that Geoff Johns’ does.  But with my love for the Green Lantern mythos, I couldn’t just stop picking up the title.  So on I go, I decided, with a new Green Lantern creative team.

It’s obvious after reading this issue that Venditti has new plans for Hal Jordan, the Green Lantern Corps, Kyle and his relationship with the elderly Guardians of Oa, and how this will all shape the other Lantern Corps of other colors.  Venditti wrote a decent enough story, but part of me wonders if the narrative lost focused due to all of the plot progressing moments.  Sure, Venditti has a lot to do to make certain his run on GL is different from Johns, but there did seem to be a little too much going on.

There’s still enough good here to make the read enjoyable; some angst is created with the Central Power Battery juiced out, and some humor comes about with Kilowog taking over as head of protocol without resizable chairs.  And with a new villain on the horizon, this installation gives us a good start for GL fans new and old.

Venditti treats Hal very well, making him rash, snarky, and sarcastic even in the face of an epic break up. What’s on the horizon for Carol Ferris? The set up certainly has my interests peaked.  The strange inclusion of Larfleeze seemed to negate the development the character has taken in the past years, and seems to be used for the sole purpose of satisfying fan popularity.  (BTW, I won’t be picking up his self-named title.  It can only be ridiculous and stupid.) Over all, though, the characters were treated very well.

I did wonder why, after all those rings were sent out for new recruits, we only got four?  I understand the humor behind it, and it helped to create tension, but where did the other rings go?  Maybe I’m complaining about something trivial, but it still bugged me.

Is it bad that I’m artistically picky? Billy Tan isn’t a bad artist, his style just isn’t my cup of tea.  The direction any character’s eyes are facing always be off the mark of where they should be.  Example – during Hal and Carol’s break up, she tends to be a bit crossed eyed.  And I’m no expert when it comes to drawing landscapes and architecture, but Tan’s take on buildings, furniture, shelving, etc, is quite bland and lifeless.  No argument being made on my part that inanimate objects always need to be lively, but so much of the “look” of this book felt boring and dull.  Drawing comics is TOUGH (as I’m slowly learning in the process of making my own) but I like to think I can create visually interesting scenery.

Overall it’s a good book.  Nothing to write home about, but definitely a good start to a new chapter in the Green Lantern mythos.  Looking forward to what’s up and coming!

6 out of 10 stars

Action-Comics_21-coverWritten by: Andy Diggle
Backup Written by: Scott Lobdell
Art by: Tony S. Daniel, Batt
Backup Art by: Philip Tan
Cover by: Tony S. Daniel
Variant Cover by: Tony S. Daniel

Lois and Jimmy get a lot of screen time this go ’round, and it’s exceptional!  Tony Daniel might be the best duel artist/writer in the business, right along side Francis Manapul.  With strong dialog, fantastic artwork, and a clear path to greatness, Action Comics takes the stand in fighting for it’s place back amongst DC’s better titles.

Monsters and over-the-top battle suits are at the heart of this issue, with a little more substance of course.  Lex Luthor gets pummeled to the ground while the rest of the surrounding by standers wonder if Superman is the enemy or Lex.  We, the faithful (and patient) readers of Action know the answer to that question, but any new comers to comics might not know what we know.  But this book is filled with epic moments and splash pages, punching the way to some very cool stuff for future issues.

I’m not entirely sure a successful conclusion came to the whole Hybrid arc – did they skip a few things because DC told Diggle it all had to end in #21? I have no clue, but I definitely felt some things were left blank – leaving only forced resolutions to close the story out.  Nothing really to do about it, and it wasn’t a real distraction as everything else going on was amazing enough to keep my attention.  I just wish I had gotten to know this hybrid character a little better as a Superman villain.  Oh well, maybe next time he/she/it shows up.

In the secondary story-line, Lara Lor-Van has stepped up her game as the mother of Superman, giving the antagonizers a round house kick to the face!  Why do I enjoy seeing strong women in comics?  Is it because it’s so different from what we normally see in comic book women?  It’s a refreshing and proactive take based on what we had in the pre-rebooted DCU.  It seems Kal-El’s personality is based more on his mother than father eh?  This could get interesting.

The end of the issue still entertains the silly Channel 52 news, which I could care less about and don’t even bother reading, but the bulk of #21 is an entertaining read all the way through.  Finally Action is being treated with some respect and Superman is who he should be.  My worries are defeated.  Action Comics, do what you will.  I will enjoy it.

See you in 30!

8 out of 10 Stars

star_trek_into_darkness_poster_enterpriseRelease Date: May 15, 2013 (IMAX 3D; 3D/2D theaters: May 16) 
Studio: Paramount Pictures 
Director: J.J. Abrams 
Screenwriter: Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci, Damon Lindelof 
Starring: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, John Cho, Bruce Greenwood, Simon Pegg, Anton Yelchin, Benedict Cumberbatch, Alice Eve, Peter Weller 
Genre: Sci-Fi 
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence) 
Official Website: StarTrekmovie.com

Let’s be honest, the new direction the Star Trek movie franchise has taken is, basically, a reboot. It has been taken, analyzed, broken down, redesigned and presented to the rest of the world as something familiar for the sake of nostalgia, yet moves forward with better character interpretations, acting, and storytelling.  Into Darkness is a thrill ride of Science Fiction and Action that brings back many of the things that made the original series so attractive while providing a much more substantial and visually appealing story, thriving on some of Star Trek’s more popularly known aspects.

It’s all very typical Star Trek storytelling – the Federation comes face to face with a conflict that’s more than what it seems.  There’s humor, arguments, chase scenes, space fights, lasers, explosions, and angst.  However all of the action ties very intimately with the major characters in the story and isn’t there simply for the sake of being so. (Well, they are, but Abrams gives the action more meaning than that.)

star-trek-2

I’ll be honest, I wasn’t expecting to love this movie.  In fact, there was part of me wondering if this sequel would simply be a rehash of of the first film, clinging hopefully onto the popularity of Benedict Cumberbatch as its saving grace. As the film started, I had these feelings of relief as it kept my attention and excited me.  It wasn’t until the terrorist’s identity was revealed when my jaw dropped and my brain began processing everything that had happened prior – and it all made sense to me. From that point on, I was hooked.  Abrams took a villain from the original cast’s history and made him better, faster, stronger, and much more interesting.  Without this, Into Darkness would have simply been a typical sequel.

None of the characters actually grew in comparison to the 2008 film, and it remained a Kirk-and-Spock show. So you feel slightly bad for the other characters who could have done well with more time in the spotlight.  That being said, Abrams was able to give everyone some time to shine. Zoe Uhura played her part well as the strong yet compassionate interpreter, while letting the men have it when they went out of line.  Anton Yelchin and Simon Pegg were great comic reliefs as Chekov and Scotty, while remaining important characters to the overall story. John Cho maintained the young, inexperienced persona as Sulu, yet brought out a commanding sense of growth to the character, showing potential as a fearless Star Ship Captain. And Karl Urban is the spitting image of Bones, both in how he speaks and his looks.

star-trek-3

And, of course there’s the main trifecta – Chris Pine as Kirk, Zack Quinto as Spock, and Benedict Cumberbatch as Khan.  All three played their parts well, with Cumberbatch stealing the show.  Quinto, while still the perfect man to play Spock, tended to play up the emotion a bit heavy handedly – humorously screaming the name of Khan originally made famous by Shatner. Pine played up the womanizing Kirk well, but it does seem like we’ve seen this before, right?  Nothing to do for it, but it did make me laugh, and I can appreciate a little repetitive humor every once in a while. And If Cumberbatch doesn’t at least get nominated for his part as Khan, I’ll denounce the academy forever! (Not really, but it’s worth a shot at making idle threats right?) Khan decking out the lab experiment garb made for a much more sympathetic character, rather than a savage brute with an extremely hideous V-cut, pectoral revealing shirt. With Cumberbatch’s resonant baritone intonation, and his intense and expressive delivery, this was his big break into the world of big name movie villainy.

A few downers – How many times can a script present set ups without addressing them later?  Into Darkness goes overboard with not justifying their plot progressing moments with unexplained elements.  In the opening scene we find Kirk running away with an indigenous tribe’s sacred scroll.  Why he did this we have no idea, it’s never explained.  Likewise, the Enterprise sits at the bottom of the ocean and rises out from the depths revealing itself to the natives, hence a violation of the prime directive.  Now the natives worship the Enterprise as some type of deity…and Kirk and company go back home without a care in the world.

star-trek-5

Other items of complaint include young Spock calling old Spock.  Why call him when it was already established early on that Khan was dangerous?  Was nostalgia kicking in and Abrams was simply giving us a quick look at the original Spock? I also seem to recall that Star Fleet infers a FLEET of ships correct?  Yet the Enterprise was left helpless against one massive war ship.

Science Fiction should always be read/watched with the understanding that it doesn’t necessarily have to make sense – time paradoxes, unrealistic science(ie) mumbo jumbo – it’s all a plethora of imaginative ridiculousness that doesn’t need to be realistic in order to be fun.  However, when the main character is being praised later on in the film for the same things he’s criticized for earlier, it conjures up an inconsistent fervor that makes me tilt my head in bewilderment.  Kirk is called arrogant, too eager to disobey the rules, and it seems like every decision he makes is scrutinized by Star Fleet.  Yet all of the arrogance and scrutiny on the part of Star Fleet isn’t supported when the actions Kirk takes are honored and praised by everyone else.  I guess the “humility” which was established early on in the story as Kirk’s lesson-to-learn fell short when he became this almost infallible character.

It’s interesting that these flaws (plus many more that I didn’t list) still don’t detract from the film’s overall spectacularly entertaining core.  This most recent Trekkie installment, as well as the last one, prove the Star Trek franchise can and WILL be exceptional as long as good writers are in control of the pen and paper.

8 out of 10 stars

Yes, yes I do.  This is truly one time where I think I’m justified in saying Michael Bay is ruining my life.  Someone I’ve never met before is ACTUALLY ruining my life.  TMNT is my childhood – a definitive part of my childhood to be exact. It’s probably the show that got me excited about the superhero concept in general.  There was something about the turtles that honestly molded my upbringing in ways I can’t explain.  It was unique, fresh, and spectacular! (Crap, I just explained it)

Now here comes a pompous director who should never touch anything that has to do with animation in the mid 1980′s.  His Transformers franchise was bad enough, what makes him think he can succeed with the Turtles.  Please Kevin Eastman and Peter Laird, do everything you can to keep this movie from happening.  Put it in the hands of someone capable.

I’ll let Aggressive Comix give you the low down about everything going on….

Batman-and-Red-Hood-20-coverWritten by: Peter J. Tomasi
Art by: Patrick Gleason, Mick Gray
Color/B&W: Color
Page Count: 32
U.S. Price: 2.99
On Sale Date: May 8 2013

From what I can tell, Batman’s journey to letting Damian go is FAR from over.  How does one cope with the loss of a son?  As I said in my review of Batman #20, I have no son, so I can’t even dream of what it feels like to loose one. I just hope the duration of the coping doesn’t weigh any of the future Bat-stories down.

Ethiopia is marked with a terrible history for Former Robin, Jason Todd – it’s where the Joker tied him down and beat him to death.  This is where he died. How he survived the Joker-planted explosion is a mystery to us all, but it’s not something Jason wishes to revisit as it brings back terrible memories.

Batman doesn’t care though.  His son is dead.  Jason survived death and Batman hopes that returning his former student to the heart of his terror will jog Jason’s memory, possibly revealing a clue as to how to resurrect Batman’s only son.  It’s hard enough for Jason to live with an almost unbearable past, as well as dealing with the fact that the Joker got away with it, but now Batman is asking Jason to reveal the secrets of his resurrection to save his son despite never showing Jason that same courtesy.  There’s a lot of tension in this 30 paged book, and intense the whole way through!

Batman vs. Red Hood. One acts a bit selfishly while the other makes a bold, and unmerited request. But to be fair, both are faced with terrible trials, working through events which have caused them great pain.  Batman never tried to saved Jason, and it’s something Jason has only recently been able to forgive Batman for.  Likewise, Batman has lost his son and isn’t in the right frame of mind to deal with it properly, unfairly asking Jason to do something he shouldn’t have to. It’s the sign of a good writer who can address two very hefty storylines and make them work so eloquently in only 30 pages.

This B&R installment also addresses issues involving the mistreatment and killing of children.  Batman lures Jason to Ethiopia by framing it as a mission to put an end to the deeds of a gang of international bounty hunters – They collected the bounty put on Damian Wayne’s head. But Jason quickly learned Batman didn’t need him to stop this pathetic band of thugs, thus leading into the heart of the story, and the reason why Batman and Jason were there to begin with.

To be honest, this isn’t an easy comic to read – it deals with death and loss almost on every page.  Even newly introduced character Carrie Kelly is having trouble understanding why Damian suddenly stopped showing to his private acting classes with her without notice. But it seems Carrie will be sticking around as the Wayne’s dog watcher thanks to Alfred’s progressively friendly demeanor.

Gleason Always amazes me month after month on any title he’s sketching. But Cliff Richard’s work is even more impressive that I couldn’t tell when Gleason’s drawings ended, and Richard’s began. But it’s within Gleason’s imperfect style that makes his art so very perfectly incredible.  He’s as good with his action as he is with his angst when the story requires it, and it’s an artistry I can only hope to achieve.

All in all, a very, VERY good read.  Every once in a while Batman and Robin is a let down, but it’s one of the more consistently well written titles coming from DC’s arsenal.

9 out of 10 stars