Archive for July, 2011

Plot: Scott Snyder

Writer: Lowell Francis

Artist: Gene Ha

Colorist: Art Lyon

Letterer: Rob Leigh

Cover Art: Gene Ha

The Plot

Subject 1 is now undergoing a series a grueling and distasteful scientific tests, all of which he refuses to give the desired result the military hopes for.  As Subject 1 attempts an escape, we learn that, sometimes, nature overcomes nurture.

My Heretical Opinion

Alright, so Ma and Pa Kent have been taken out of the picture and Kal-El’s upbringing is not on a small town farm in Smallville, KS, but rather in a scientific containment unit that’s only good for a crawl space for little Kal-El…and to conduct a few human experiments as well.

Here, in the world of Flashpoint, Kal-El has no reason to care for Earthlings due to the treatment he has been given ever since crash landing on Earth.  He is nothing but a science experiment for the military to use in order to build the ultimate super soldier.  This new origin story to the Man of Steel defies everything we have come to know about Superman.

Before Flashpoint began, Superman was the epitome of the all American hero standing for truth, justice, and (according to Actions Comics #900) the way of the world.  Why now would we expect Superman to grow up and be a seeker of truth and justice after everything he has endured as a young boy in the world of Flashpoint?  Lowell Francis, in this series, attempts to answer that question by showing how Superman’s goodness and grace is much more innate than anyone would expect.

Like with all superheroes, parenthood falls in as one of the key contributors to any origin story, usually resulting in the death of a father, mother, or uncle.  In this case, the ultimate oxymoron occurs as General Sam Lane becomes the father figure for little Kal-El.  While Lane is the one in charge of basically torturing Kal-El, (giving new meaning to the term “I hurt you because I love you) there is a sense of a loving attitude within Lane’s character, and the end result of this issue personifies that to the fullest with Lane’s own self-sacrifice.

It’s in that moment where Kal-El sees an example of love and, I suspect, will be the defining aspect of his past that will eventually lead to his superherodom.  But there are other events which occur that show Kal-El as a naturally caring person; the love he shows towards Subject 2 (otherwise known as Krypto) and the visual reaction he has towards the chewed up baseball next to the photograph of Lane’s wife and son are perfect examples of this.  This all foreshadows the inevitable fact that Kal-El might just be the only incorruptible superhero to ever exist.

Speaking of things that will never change, I think Lionel Luthor has just been dubbed the most evil person to ever exist in fiction!  How awful it is to push your own son into the oncoming danger just to save yourself!  After reading this issue, you’re going to want to rip Lionel’s head off!

I’m not familiar with Gene Ha, but certainly he has a talent for making an uninteresting art style exceptionally beautiful to look at.  That may have to do with the amazing coloring job by Art Lyon.  (How wonderful to be an artist and be named Art…destiny maybe?)  Each character is so wooden and stiff, yet I find them captivating and very expressive, and the use of light and shadows was expertly executed for that finishing touch.

So how much of what is happening in Flashpoint will transcend into the DCnU’s version of Superman and how much will stay behind.  If this origin story sticks around, I truly think I’m going to enjoy the upcoming Superman reboot.

10 out of 10

+ 2 Incentive points.

Writer: Jonathan Vankin

Artist: Renato Arlem

Colorist: Barb Ciardo

Letterer: Sal Cipriano

Cover Art: Ardian Syaf, Vicente Cifuentes, & Ulises Arreola

The Plot

John Constantine is making his comeback into the DCU in fine style by going head to head with his old swampy pal.  However, this time is different.  Alec Holland and the Swamp Thing have separated, causing Swampy to get all hot and bothered in search of a new host.  I guess this explains why Constantine is developing a leafy rash on his hand.  Could Johnny-boy be the new host for Swamp Thing?  With Superman’s help, Constantine goes through many trials and tribulations to get to the bottom of this mystery.

Elsewhere, Alec Holland goes on a hunt for the truth of his swampified separation and comes face to face with something I’m sure he wasn’t prepared to see.

My Heretical Opinion

Jonathan Vankin is doing one hell of a job of reintroducing both Swamp Thing and John Constantine into the DCU.  I’ve always loved Swamp Thing and was worried about how this reintroduction was going to play out.  I couldn’t be happier!

Swamp Thing has gone through a few changes over the years; a man who turns into a plant, a plant who thinks he’s a man, it’s all jumped around fairly frequently.  Neither Len Wein nor Alan Moore’s work on the origin story were ever quite canonized.  Vankin, however, seems to be taking both origins and combining them into something very interesting which, I hope, turns into a canonized beginning story of Swamp Thing.

I love seeing Constantine play the tough guy while deep down inside, as his inner monologues suggest, he’s terrified of what might become of him.  We already know Constantine isn’t going to become Swampy’s new host since his involvement with the upcoming Justice League Dark title has been revealed, so the question of how Constantine is going to be affected by this conflict still remains up in the air.  But even more intriguing, why does Swamp Thing want Constantine as his new host?

Superman’s involvement is very entertaining too.  Apart from the hilarious banter that he and Constantine share back and forth, Supes maintains a very uninterested persona in John’s dilemma.  In the last decade, Superman has become one of the most interesting superheroes in the DCU.  Aside from his “grounded” story arc, Superman’s storylines have been nothing BUT stellar, and it shows in this second Brightest Day Aftermath installment.  Superman seems almost TOO willing to let Constantine go into the forest, as if he wouldn’t mind seeing the Australian annoyance kick the bucket.  But of course, in classic Superman style, he saves the day. But it’s nice to see Supes acting in a “questionable” manner for a change.

But the most interesting aspect of the story is, of course, Alec Holland and his search for truth.  This is where the penultimate climax for the story occurs and will undoubtedly push fans into the upcoming revitalized Swamp Thing title.  Is Alec going merg with Swampy again, or will he play an entirely different role?  And who’s the man behind the surgical mask I wonder?  Could it be Lex Luthor, or some other character we haven’t seen in a while who’ll take us by complete surprise once his mask is removed?  These are the things I wonder about, and I’m excited to see the result!

Renato Arlem’s style is interesting.  It’s very dark and gothic (something I personally and artistically appeal too) but all the characters seem very wooden and lifeless to me.  Every once in a while a panel of Constantine’s face appears and it scares the living crap out of me, but most of the time I can’t get past the “boring” nature of the art.  Arlem is talented, don’t get me wrong, but it just isn’t for me.  If it wasn’t for Vankin’s awesome storytelling, this title would put me to sleep.

With Swamp Thing returning, and DC Comics going through a complete revamp of the DCU, I’ve been wondering how well the HORROR side of the company is going to play out.  So far…I like what I’m seeing.

9 out of 10 Stars

Superhero Art Nouveau has become increasingly interesting to me.  Karen Zachary Wang created this very interesting piece depicting Wonder Woman in her normal and powerful stance.  While this isn’t neccesarily “New” as the style of art’s name would insinuate, it’s still very much worthy of artistic praise.

So I found this children’s book at a friends house this weekend.  i thought it was fucking hilarious when I saw it.  But I got even more excited when I found out Samuel L. Jackson agreed to narrate it for the world to hear!  Enjoy the greatest children’s story ever written…Go The Fuck To Sleep!

Release Date: July 22, 2011 (3D/2D theaters)
Studio: Paramount Pictures, Marvel Studios
Director: Joe Johnston
Screenwriter: Christopher Markus, Stephen McFeely
Starring: Chris Evans, Tommy Lee Jones, Hugo Weaving, Hayley Atwell, Sebastian Stan, Dominic Cooper, Toby Jones, Neal McDonough, Derek Luke, Stanley Tucci
Genre: Action, Adventure
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for intense sequences of sci-fi violence and action)
Official Website: CaptainAmerica.com

The Patriotic Plot

Let’s not disillusion ourselves, Captain America presents the perfect storyline for the fellow American searching for that perfect movie to show what being a TRUE American should be like; selfless, brave, and willing to die for his fellow man.  The film is about a 98 pound Steve Rogers with very little athletic ability, but has a heart of gold.  His efforts to join the military have been persistent, yet pointless.  It wasn’t until Dr. Abraham Erskine notices Rogers’ persistence and nominated him for a very special super soldier experiment, which increased his muscle mass, athleticism, healing system and metabolism.  The perfect American soldier!

Enter the Nazi regime, Hydra! Led by Johann Schmidt, who, years back, was the first volunteer for the super soldier experiment.  Of course, it wasn’t fully perfected yet and left him scared.  Schmidt is now determined to destroy the world with this newly discovered source of energy to power his weapons of mass destruction and proclaim himself ruler of the world.  Rodgers will now be put to the test and go tooth and nail against the Red Skull!

And Once The American and Nazi Slugfest Is Done…

It’s the third Marvel Comics film to hit the big screen this summer.  But unlike Thor and X-Men: First Class, Captain America is a period film which pays tribute to the War World II movies of the 1940’s and 1950’s.  Harkening back to the World War II era, Joe Johnston does this film justice by shouting out to the B-Movie clichés of manly military heroics of how America was striving for a super patriotic persona worldwide.  It’s a classic film making technique of military nostalgia…and a bunch of Nazis.

For those of you who don’t know comics and their history, most of the superheroes that we know and love today were spawned out of that WW II era, and almost all of them were Nazi hating icons; Superman, Wonder Woman, even Spider-Man had his own tussles with Nazi supporters.  Captain America, not surprisingly, was Timely Comics’ (the name of the publishing company before changing to Marvel Comics) most popular hero, rivaling even Superman and Wonder Woman who were both born out of that same anti-Nazi sentiment.  But as the war ended, so did the Captain’s popularity.  It wasn’t until just over a decade ago when the Captain’s popularity came back full swing, now owning of his own full-length feature film!

Unfortunately, Director Quentin Tarentino gave movie goers a different perspective on the whole World War II era with his film “Inglorious Basterds” which could jolt the younger viewers going to see Captain America’s first theatrical film.  Filled with corny one-liners and over the top patriotism, this film is nothing but an American tribute to the brave and selfless men and women who have died or sacrificed something in the name of freedom…as it should be. (gag, I’m going to be sick.)

Johnston did right in giving Steve Rogers that corny “poster boy for America” feel, script and all.  For those of you who think Superman is a boy scout, just watch Capy’s movie and think about that again.  But Rodgers doesn’t simply want to defend America from the Nazi’s, but rather be a defender of humanity.  While lying on his medical bed after being asked the question “Do you want to Kill Nazis son?”  His response was “I don’t want to kill anyone…I hate bullies.”  Johnston portrays Captain America appropriately with that one line.  This is a Captain America for a modern age.

But know this, the film is purposefully corny.  You may find yourself slapping your hand against your forehead, sarcastically asking yourself “did he seriously just say that?”  Just remember, the types of corny one liners you’ll find in this film are appropriate for the time period it’s shouting out too.  Allow yourselves to sit back and take a trip to the 1950’s when World War II films were just like this (minus the better acting, better special effects, and writing) and take a look into your parents cinematic upbringing…you might appreciate it even more.  The music alone should make you feel like you’re watching something from almost 60 years ago.  (But of course I’m 30, so what do I really know about living in the 1950s right?)

While the film gives us a wonderful movie going experience of the 1950’s, with excellent costuming, faded film colorization, and awesomely cheesy patriotic productions – show girls, fireworks and all, Captain America doesn’t present anything new.  It’s a story about a little guy who overcomes great odds and, by the end of the film, saves the day becoming an inspiration to everyone.  The film’s plot progression also mimics that of a typical Hollywood production; typical Hollywood love story, typical Hollywood heroics, typical Hollywood inspirational speeches, and typical Hollywood use of one liners used at the beginning of the movie in the film’s climax to help bring the two lovers and/or friends together in a cheesy moment of friendship and love.  (GAG!)

I also wasn’t entirely sure what the Red Skull was trying to do.  He had this source of unbelievable, God-like power, and his plan was to do…what?!?  I get the impression it was to take over the world, but it was never truly made clear…simply implied by the names of cities painted on the bomb-like propeller jets in Skully’s enormous fighter plane of death.

The casting for this film was perfect.  Chris Evans was a masterful Captain America and much different from his role as the Human Torch.  So what happens if Marvel decides to do a crossover movie with Captain America and the Fantastic Four?   (It won’t happen, I’m just being silly.)  Hayley Atwell portrays an excellent, strong-willed love interest for Stevie, and Tommy Lee Jones does wonderful with his typical dry humored portrayal of Colonel Chester Phillips.  Hugo Weaving, as always with any role he plays, is perfect as the Red Skull.  Although I wasn’t particularly impressed with the make-up job…he just didn’t seem scary enough.  The 1990’s “direct to video” version of the Red Skull was 10 times scarier than the most current version.

Of course, the reviews are doing nothing but compare Captain America to the all time greatest superhero movie to ever come out in theaters…the Dark Knight…as well as getting hit with compare and contrast notes by some of the more recent comic book films to come out.  Let’s be perfectly clear, this is not a film about a team of mutants, a deity of Norse mythology, a human who wears a ring of mystical energy, or a womanizing male who goes out every night scaring the living daylights out of anyone walking the streets.  This is a Captain America film!  It isn’t supposed to compare to all the others.  So let’s not worry about how it compares to the rest, just worry about its “stand-alone” ability as a film  in and  itself.

Despite its very awkward ten minute set-up sequence for the Avenger’s movie towards the end of the film, (set for a 2012 summer release date) Captain America does quite well in my opinion.  And to be honest, after X-Men, this might just be Marvel’s best film to date.

8 out of 10 stars.

Writer: Derek Fridolfs

Penciller: Jamal Igle

Inker: John Dell

Colorist: John Kalisz

Letterer: Pat Brosseau

Cover Art: Adam Hughes

The Plot

In a nut shell, Zatanna has to fight off an ancient band of religious nutcases who believe that anything supernatural and magical  should be burned at the stake.  After hunting down all the vampires, werewolves, ghouls, goblins and whatever other “unholy” creatures are out there, they decided to focus all their hunting efforts on Zatanna…by way of invitation.

After receiving a nasty slice by an almost precise arrow to her throat, Zatanna scolds herself for walking right into the cults trap.  But, due to the archer’s incredibly eye, Zatanna has been left speechless.  So now the question is…can Zatanna get herself out of this pickle without magic at her side?

Before I Begin…

So let me start off by saying that I don’t care how much you get upset by a publisher’s “deceptive methods,” don’t spend a significant chunk of your review whining about how DC’s website administrator screwed up on who actually WROTE the script.  Sure, give the right author proper credit, but don’t get so bent out of shape about it.  I am, of course, referring to the review published at A Comic Book Blog.  Lighten up buddy.

And Onto The Review

The premise of Zatanna #15 is an interesting one; this cult of religious nuts spill the beans by telling Zatanna that they, and those who came before, have hunted down her kind (witches) for centuries, determined to purge the world of them.  Witch hunting is an old plot concept that has been swimming around in gothic literature for over one hundred years and is still being used in modern literature to this very day.  So the concept of hunting down the “unnatural” creatures of the world isn’t new.  But what makes it stick out for this particular comic book is the mere fact that, out of all the supernatural beings on Earth, it is Zatanna that this cult believes holds the greatest threat to humanity.  Not Superman or any of the other more powerful men and women, just Zatanna…quite the interesting approach wouldn’t you agree?

While many fellow readers might find that idea to be a little difficult to grasp onto, rest assured the character of Zatanna is not compromised in the least despite how well the cult hindered her ability to use magic.  Just like with Harry Potter, Zatanna’s ability to save the day does not truly rely on her magical capabilities, but rather on her resourcefulness.  Despite all of the obstacles, Zatanna is able to stay alive long enough to figure out a plan while taking out a few of the red-robed goons on the process.  Of course, what does save her in the end is a small, wound healing potion which heals her throat, allowing her to use her spells to bring the dogmatic boneheads down.  But everything leading up to her inevitable win was all brains and stealth, nothing more.

Jamal Igle is fantastic!  He draws some of the most expressive faces on characters, (right after Amanda Conner) and creates actions scenes that are so vibrant and colorful that I can’t help but stare at each panel in awe.

Zatanna is fun and has been since issue #1.  The thing I love most about this title is its new reader accessibility.  As long as you know Zatanna uses spells and wears fish-net stockings, you should be good to go.  The jumping on points with this title are numerous, and there’s only been 15 issues!  If this series wasn’t going to end next month, I would recommend to everyone that THIS specific issue would have been a great jumping on point for new readers.  But alas…  Oh well, it’s still a fun comic and you wouldn’t be wasting your $2.99 (and some tax) on this issue.

9 out of 10 stars

So two of my favorite comic book blogs, www.girls-gone-geek.com and onceuponageek.com were featured on a show called “Nerd Lunch” which is a webs series where nerds get together and talk about…well, nerdy things.  I had the privilege of talking with Vanessa and Erika, the two authors of Girl Gone Geek, over the phone a few months ago specifically about their blog, how they got started along with a few of their interests within the comic book world.  So for me, it was actually really cool to see them headlining a web series and getting to see their faces while they talk so passionately about their interests.

Below is that very episode.  It’s interesting because it toggles between conversations about a neat local restaurant and and comics.  While you watch the video, make sure you jot down the each blog address as they pop up in the video and go pay Girls Gone Geek and Once Upon a Geek a visit!

Writer: Tony Bedard

Artist: Miguel Sepulveda & Tyler Kirkman

Inker: Sepulveda & Batt

Colorist: Rain Beredo

Letterer: Rob Leigh

Cover Art: Dave Johnson

The Plot

The Corps is suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder…so their illogical anger is putting every single member at risk.  But the guardians aren’t taking this lightly and looking into every angle of this most recent, and horrific event, drawing most their attention to the newly inducted Green Lantern…Sinestro.  To top it all off, most of the Corps takes every available opportunity to take a swing at John Stewart for blowing up Green Lantern planet Mogo.

While the Corps is on the verge of collapsing, a small band of Lanterns plot against one of their most hated enemies, Sinestro, who is, as already stated, a chosen member of the GL Corps.  With the entire Corps fallen victim to so much stress, this is not surprising…but how will Lantern Natu respond when she is asked to partake in the murder of her father?

Before I Begin….

It does get a bit cumbersome after a while when you have you go to your local comic book shop and discover DC has created another “aftermath” series to a major comic book event.  The War of the Green Lanterns ended fantastically, leaving a lot of room for awesome things to happen for Green Lantern #1 come September.  An aftermath series just didn’t seem like a good idea to me.

I decided to give it a shot anyway.  If I’m too follow the new series, and knowing Johns doesn’t plan on changing much, it might be a good idea to stay up to date with all the GL happenings.  Among the four comics that I picked up Wednesday, I saved this first issue of two for last knowing I’d probably be disappointed.  However, I was pleasantly surprised and, to be honest, found it the most enjoyable of the four.

Elsewhere…

This series is most definitely hurling fans into the new direction Green Lantern will be taking, one that has truly taken me by surprise.  In turn, this leaves multiple questions in my head…Is Hal Jordan done?  Is Sinestro permanently taken over as head hero for the revamped GL title?  Is the Corps doomed to fail?  How will the Green Lantern mythos be altered by this whole ordeal?

As I sat in my bed pondering on these questions, I then thought you myself… “This is exactly what Geoff Johns, Tony Bedard, and DC want.”  And, currently, there is no title I’m more excited for in the rebooted DCU than Green Lantern.

Unlike the other titles, Green Lantern has been doing an excellent job at preparing us for the fall of the old, and the rise of the new.  The best chapter in a story is when everything goes to Hell right?  Right now, the Corps is enduring nothing but Hell with Hal kicked out of the Corps, Sinestro being looked upon as its savior, the guardians becoming even more assholish than normal, and each member of the Corps ready to rip out each other’s throats.  It’s a fantastic tale of hardships and how people truly deal with one another when the entire world around seems to be crumbling at the base.  This is not a happy book, but it’s a book that will keep your attention from start to finish.

With all of those positives, it pains me to say that I was drastically unimpressed with the artistic endeavors by Miguel Sepulveda and Tyler Kirkman.  Characters felt too wooden and visually uninteresting.  And was it just me or did it seem like, during the confrontation between Kyle Rayner and John Stewart, the three pissed off Lanterns looked strikingly like other characters of the DCU?  I wonder what Oliver Queen would have to say about his likeness being portrayed as a Lantern?  (He’d probably eat it up.)

Drawing and inking aside, Rain Beredo (I like the name rain) shoves the unimpressive sketches aside to make room for a stunning display of color and light.  Nothing is overdone and everything is delightful.

So now Krona is dead, and the plot couldn’t be thicker.  Next month is just around the corner and a new beginning is excitedly pumping my comic book needs to an all-time high.  Tony Bedard, thanks so much for making this a great ending to a fantastic series.  Let’s just hope issue #2 delivers an equally exciting storyline.  Fingers crossed.

7 our of 10 stars

So here you go guys and gals, the official trailer of the next Spider-Man movie…The Amazing Spider-Man…

I’m not sure what I think of it yet.  Part of me still isn’t sure why Marvel Studios felt a reboot franchise reboot was neccesary so soon.  But the other half of me would really like to see some GOOD Spider-Man films come out in theaters.

I’m also worried about the future of the super-hero film genre.  Currently Spider-Man, the Incredible Hulk, AND the Puinisher have had reboots only a few years after the films preceding the rebooted versions.  Is this going to be a consistent trend with Marvel films?  Will the Fantastic Four, Dare Devil and other Marvel film franchises seek out reboots as well?  Why does Marvel feel like they wasted their money on the THREE PREVIOUS films?

My fear is that, one day, all we’re going to have within the superhero genre are origin stories.  this was one of the things that appealed to me the most with Superman Returns…it wasn’t an origin story.

Now I am interested to see how they “darken up” this origin story.  It looks very similar to the first X-Men movie, very dark and meaningful.  I’m going to do my best to throw out any preconceived notions I have about the movie and judge it for what it is.

Here’s to hoping…

Writer: Matthew Sturges

Artist: Hendry Prasetya

Colorist: Jessica Kholinne

Letterer: Travis Lanham

Cover Art: Sami Basri

Before I Begin….

Wow!  It’s a miracle!!  Having a good number of comic book subscriptions has taught me that I will always get my comics a week (and sometimes two weeks) after they hit the comic book stands.  Yet, Monday evening I stood amazed at the fact that, after I got the mail and opened the plastic wrapped comic book, I was holding Power Girl #26…two days before it was supposed to be in comic book stores for sale.  This is a first!  If only the subscription service was always this prompt.

In The Meantime…

This issue of Power Girl finds us in the midst of a new writer, JSA All-Stars superstar Matthew Sturges!  Power Girl has now reached the ultimate point of superherodom…by making a special guest appearance at the first ever Power Girl convention!  Of course, in perfect tradition of comic book folklore, no superhero can have a little bit of fun without a little bit of chaos trailing close behind.  So what does Power Girl do when her biggest fan is an alien trespasser who wants to kidnap Pee Gee to be her planets personal body guard?

Elsewhere…

It wasn’t until I opened to the first page when I realized Judd Winick wasn’t going to finish out the Power Girl run before the DCnU revamp kisses her goodbye.  I took me a little bit before I got over this sad and unfortunate fact and relished in the knowledge that a just-as-capable writer is taking over the final two issues of one of my favorite titles.  And Sturges doesn’t disappoint as he continues the humorous and hokey approach that started when Jimmy Palmiotti was in charge of the literary duties.

Sturges has a little fun by taking the world of cosplaying and integrating it into the DC Universe.  Smart move as I’m sure cosplaying will be at its all times highest with ABC and NBC filming the upcoming Comic-Con to be broadcasted on national television.  I’ve always enjoyed a good, well-made costume, especially when those costumes represent the heroes I adore the most.  I’ve never actually had the privilege of attending a major comic book convention before (something I hope to rectify very soon) but I can only imagine that the amount of star struck fans is exactly like this…multiplied by 100!

But this issue wasn’t truly about how awesome Power Girl is, but more about how much confidence she instills in her loyal fans, promoting the concept of “Girl Power,” as Pee Gee so puts it.  And in the corniest way possible, Sturges allows this to come to life by providing the perfect opportunity for three of her most loyal fans to save Power Girl from the clutches of a new alien enemy.  We all love a story where the unlikely hero saves the day, and even better when it’s the cute preteen (I am NOT a pedophile) who plays the most significant role.

I was a tad bit confused as to where in the world (is Carmen Sandiego) those magical alien clayfaces came from.  I’m certain Sturges wants us extend our notion of disbelief and accept it for what it is…science fiction…which means it doesn’t need explanation.  But I can’t help but wonder why the Hell they popped out of nowhere and said BOO!  But, this is me, a fan boy, unable to let things go and get so nit-picky that I allow it to dictate my entire opinion and perception of the entire issue.  I shall step back and just accept it for what it is and enjoy the unrealistic fun that comes along with Power Girl.

Hendry Prasetya, as always, puts his best effort out there and delivers some outstanding pencil work.  Page one shows us a Power Girl with a black curtain behind her delivering a moving speech that’s bound to have a punch line at the turn of a page.  I swear, it doesn’t matter who the artist is, Power Girl has the best serious glare of any superhero in the DC Universe.  Something about her brings out the best in any artist.  I’m perfectly content and happy with Prasetya finishing up this series as its main artist.

With only one issue left to go, I’m not sure how to deal.  I’ve been on board with power Girl since the beginning.  It’s been the most consistently awesome title published by DC Comics…right after the Secret Six.  Ugh, my sorrows are only going to grow from this point.

9 out of 10 stars

Definitely my feelings about the teaser trailer for Dark Knight Rises.  The only difference here is…I trust Chris Nolan and am fully confident that he’ll deliver a quality film.  Anyways, enjoy!

Release Date: June 24, 2011 (3D/2D theaters and IMAX 3D)
Studio: Disney•Pixar
Director: John Lasseter, Brad Lewis
Screenwriter: Ben Queen
Starring: Owen Wilson, Larry the Cable Guy, Michael Caine, Emily Mortimer, Jason Isaacs, Joe Mantegna, Peter Jacobson, Thomas Kretschmann, Bonnie Hunt, Cheech Marin, Tony Shalhoub, Guido Quaroni, Lloyd Sherr, Paul Dooley, John Ratzenberger, Jenifer Lewis, Michael Wallis, Katherine Helmond, John Turturro, Franco Nero, Vanessa Redgrave, Eddie Izzard, Bruce Campbell, Michel Michelis, Jeff Gordon, Darrell Waltrip, Lewis Hamilton, David Hobbs
Genre: Adventure, Animation, Comedy
MPAA Rating: G

So the reviews have been out for quite some time and Cars 2 is faced with a mob of angry parents and loyal Pixar fans who don’t really know what to say about it.  I saw Cars 2 on the opening weekend but decided not to write a review due to time constraints.  However, from what I’ve been reading on the net, the response the 2nd Cars film has been getting has lead me to write up a response to the controversial reviews from parents and family oriented people.

When I first heard that Cars 2 was met with less than satisfactory reactions, I wasn’t too surprised.  I always try to give Pixar the benefit of the doubt because of their awesome track record of constantly producing incredible films, (I initially thought the two Toy Story sequels were going to flop on their face…Just look at how wrong I was!) but in my gut I had a feeling that Cars 2 could be that inevitable flop for Pixar Studios.  After walking out of the theater, my internal reaction was “it was loads of fun…but lacking the heart that the first Cars film had.”  And I still hold to that.  Cars 2 is more about the action and thrills than it is about the emotional connection to the characters and story.

In this James Bond centered plot, Mater adopts the role of the hero while Lightning McQueen kicks back and enjoys the job of the supportive cast member.  I’m sure you can find the plot synopsis anywhere online, so I’ll skip over the boring stuff you don’t care to hear.  All in all, the reviewers are right, this is a shoot ‘em up and spit ‘em out kind of film.  So, for you parents out there, the question you have to ask yourself is…Can my child handle this film based on the parent reactions?

Now I’m writing this review under the assumption that you have already heard much of the hub bub about its violent and “adult” nature of Cars 2.  I found this comment on Rotten Tomatoes from one parent that made me tilt my head to the side in bewilderment…

“There is a ton of shooting, deaths and other violence in the movie.   I had to leave 1/3 of the way in with my 5 year old after the torture part.   You should just use the money towards some of the Cars toys.”

Finding this fueled my desire to research more on this whole parent reaction to Cars 2, only to find myself in the midst of numerous parent critiques on how the film should have had a higher rating and how appalled they were at it amount of violence and murderous scenes found throughout the film.

On one particular website, parent Sarah Hover stated that, after the terrifying introduction sequence, there was later “a torture scene where they’re spinning this car’s wheels trying to get him [an unnamed car] to talk about something and he doesn’t do it and in the reflection you see the car blow up and I’m thinking to myself ‘oh I hope [my son] doesn’t catch on to what’s happening right now.”

Later last week I did some more research and found a review from Author Josh Tyler over at Cinema Blend and how he felt the film was a completely inappropriate movie venture for any family with young children under the age of five…

Letting them sit through Pixar’s latest may leave you with a pint-sized terror who grows up to be some self-centered asshole flipping off the man while he runs down pedestrians in the middle of an intersection.”

Over at Two Peas In A Bucket, which is a message board website where people can comment on whatever their hearts desire, numerous people commented on the film’s violence and how shocked and appalled they were by the fact.  A few examples….

“I was appalled. It was Grand Theft Auto: The Preschool Years. There was extreme violence (guns, torture scenes, cars being burned alive). My 4 yr old was in tears wanting to know why the cars hated each other. The night after we saw it he had nightmares that cars were trying to kill him Taking my kids to see this movie is one of my worst mommy moments ever. I just can’t believe Disney made this movie this way. It was SO unnecessary.

I just can’t believe Disney made this movie this way. It was SO unnecessary.

My dd’s family went to it and my 4 yr old grandson ended up crying. Dad said it would probably have been fine for older kids, but she wasn’t impressed with it as a movie for younger ones. If you ask my grandson if he liked the movie he is very quick to say “no”.

“My 8 year old ds said it was too violent, and I agreed. It held my attention I guess, but certainly not something I would ever watch again, unlike Cars 1 which was played over and over by ds at my house, so I got to see it a lot.”

Do your own search and you’ll see what I’m talking about.  Parents truly are getting a bit heated about how this film might hurt their children’s imaginative minds.  And it’s true what parents are saying, Cars 2 has a lot of shooting, violence and other questionable scenes that borderline on a PG rating.  But let’s take a look back in the history of Pixar and how Cars 2, honestly, really isn’t any different from anything else Pixar has put out.

The Incredibles – Why wasn’t there a fuss raised about this film?  I would argue that there’s more violence in the Incredibles than in Cars 2.  There’s punching, fighting, slapping, explosions, shooting, kid’s getting involved with outrageously dangerous events, and I even recall one instance where a human actually dies!  I would think this would have even bigger psychological implications than seeing a car rip apart from a distance after hitting the water at great speeds.

Toy Story – The third film especially deals with some fairly dark material, most of which young people under the age of ten really have idea how to comprehend.  All it is is scary to them, especially in the last scene.  But of course, parents gave this gem enough money to break the bank.  Toy Story deals with a fact of life that all adults have had to face at some point or another…one day you’re going to have to give up your childhood and become an adult.  This film represents the life of every adult sitting in the theater.  Kids can’t understand this feeling.

Up! – Not too much violence here, just a lot of adult oriented issues that kids really shouldn’t be exposed to at such an early age.  But Pixar did it all the same, and successfully gave it all for families to behold; complicated dilemmas of infertility, nostalgic sentimentalities, the inability to let go of one’s past, and the whole concept of loosing a wife you’ve grown old with…these are not things children can truly respond too well with a deep comprehension.

Go back and watch all the Pixar films and I’ll bet you anything you’ll find some aspect of Cars 2 in every single one of them.

So what’s really the issue that parents are having with the movie?  I think it’s, more or less, the fact that this film had less heart in it than every other Pixar film that’s come out.  Most family oriented films have a deep moral core that it revolves around which helps families to enjoy it that much more.  But Cars 2 takes a different approach.  Instead of being so heartfelt and meaningful, it decided to be action packed and exciting…with a bit of heart mingled in towards the end.

Cars 2, as much as I loved it, felt more like it was a 2 hour long episode for a Cars Saturday morning cartoon show.  The first film was all about slowing down and not trying to rush through life all the time.  Cars 2, to a certain extent, negates that…until the very end when friendship and love are brought to life in the way Lighting and Mater forgive themselves for how they both acted in this new territory.

I would ask parents to not simply throw this film out as a violent piece of crap, but accept it as a brief new direction that Pixar wanted to experiment with. It’s a quality film that’s probably one of their best animated features to date.  Just know what the film’s purpose is and make a decision from there.  In which case, I ask you again to figure out if you think YOUR children can handle a film as fun and exciting as Cars 2…with some shooting.

7.5 out of 10 stars

Release Date: July 15, 2011 (3D/2D theaters and IMAX 3D)
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Director: David Yates
Screenwriter: Steve Kloves
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Helena Bonham Carter, Robbie Coltrane, Warwick Davis, Tom Felton, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, Jason Isaacs, Alan Rickman, David Thewlis, Julie Walters, Bonnie Wright, Kelly Macdonald
Genre: Adventure, Fantasy
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for some sequences of intense action violence and frightening images)
Official Website: HarryPotter.com

It’s hard to put it into words without sounding like a Harry Potter fan who can’t accept a film that doesn’t stick to its source material 100%, but I can’t help it…I was terrified for the Deathly Hallows!  Of course many of my fellow book readers can probably share the sentiment with me right?  Part one of the Deathly Hallows did in fact leave much to be revealed, and part two is shorter than part one!

Four hours prior to my trek to the movie theater, I popped part one into my DVD player and threw a few questions at myself as well as my wife, essentially coming to the conclusion that there was NOW WAY they are going to fit in everything necessary for this final film to come to a successful conclusion.

Evil thoughts of film failure jolted my brain, thoughts like “There’s too many Horcruxes to destroy” & “how cut down will the conversation between Harry and Dumbledore be?”  Those moments leading up to the actual start of the film were filled with fear and angst for me.  How in the world could this film work with so much left to reveal?

However, in a classic finish to a storybook’s ending, The Deathly Hallows part two turns out to be one of best in the HP franchise.  My fears and struggles had subsided almost from the start as an effortless flow of storyline came through in true J.K. Rowling style.  The film achieved some amazing feats with its overall look, the editing flow, musical score and acting quality.  But while the movie does a fantastic job at keeping all of the important scenes from the book in the film, there is still a sense of loss and uncertainty throughout the entire film.

Every single Harry Potter novel is filled with incredible moments.  These moments are what make the books so interesting and is the reason they are so popular to this day.  And just like the boy who lived himself, the films have been up and down in how well they bring these moments to life.  But this is all due to the fact that, just like any film adapted from a novel, time constraints prevent the film makers from truly giving the audience the author intended.

Part two, essentially only deals with the last third of the book, skipping over what really weighed part one down with all of the teenaged drama and emo moments of confusion and disloyalty.  The film starts off with images from the last from the last movie, with Voldemort driving the Elder wand into the air as the blinding beam of magic shoots up with all the force a Slytherin can muster creating the WB logo in the stormy sky.  This, in turn begins the focus on the action and confrontation of the book’s climax.

The film does a fine job at expanding on the excerpts from the book and turning them into wonderful visual splendors to behold; the chaotic and dangerous trip to Gringott’s, the fantastic protective spell that hovers over Hogwart’s, the great and epic battle sequence that destroyed Hogwart’s, and of course the last moment Snape and Harry have before he discovers the professors overall purpose in the story which changes the shape of thing to come.  Of course, as great as these moments are, the film will never be able to truly bring out their full effect that the book was able to do.  But this is, of course, a testament to Director David Yeats directing abilities and making the Harry Potter fans weep, as found in this video review of the film…

On the other side of the coin, the money and time that went into making everything as perfect as possible cannot go unrecognized as Stuart Craig’s production designs were fully realized in every aspect of the word.  The Room of Requirement had more furniture in it than the American Furniture Warehouse, and Gringott’s vault contained over 200,000 coins and other golden and silver treasures that would make Scrooge McDuck salivate all over his fine Victorian clothing.  One should ask the question, is there anything we wouldn’t do for Mr. Potter?

Apparently not as the casting in this film was, of course, nothing BUT stellar.  The amazing part of this entire franchise is the film’s three stars, Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson, have been with us since The Sorcerer’s Stone.  They were great then and have only grown in their acting abilities.  But the question remains, will their magical stardom haunt them for the rest of their lives?  Will they be able to transcend the effects of being the Hogwart’s trifecta?

One of the most interesting aspects of the Harry Potter Franchise is how well it ran with a conservative approach, with only The Half Blood Prince being daring enough to transcend that trend.  Rarely have the Potter films truly defied anything that Hollywood typically has to offer.  Yet the films have been a success with each and every installment, begging myself to ask the question… “If Rowling had never written the books, and the films still came out like they are, would they have been as successful?”

I tend to answer in the affirmative.  It’s one of the most epic stories I have ever read, and while the films stick to a conservative approach, still come off in fine fashion.  But it has more to do with the excellent acting performed by each and every member of the cast.  And as always, Alan Rickman, (the beloved Snape) always leaves the lasting, and most memorable impression.

But the fact is the books do exist.  And it is in the words of Albus Dumbledore which inspire the most out of this story, “words are our most inexhaustible source of magic.”  J.K. Rowling might more of a witch than we realize.  Her profound and enjoyable way of telling a written story has more magic than anything J.R.R. Tolkien was able to conjure up…and that’s saying A LOT!  It is Rowling we have to thank for bringing us one of the most epic and memorable stories the world has ever seen.  Thank you Rowling, you are an inspiration.

And, for your entertainment, please enjoy, directly from the Fine Bros., seven Harry potter movies recapped in seven minutes…

For those of you who follow my blog, (all seven of you) I’m sure you’ve all noticed that I’ve been away almost two week.  I was busy with a singing competition.  My chorus received a 3rd place finish and one of our best scoring averages ever.  Needless to say, I was very preoccupied.  But I’m back and ready to continue posting!

This post was inspired by a conversation I had with a friend..our differences in films we like.  We had some very interesting conversations about what makes a good film, and what doesn’t.  So, in response, I’ve decided to make a list of my favorite and most hated films.  The two lists are in no specific order.

So without further delay….

My All Time Favorite Movies!

Doubt

Without a doubt (no pun  intended) this film took me by complete surprise.  It was not only well made, but went above and beyond in analytical thought and challenged the popular belief that “doubt” is bad thing to have.  This dialog heavy film represents what film making used to be like, completely driven by the story, dialog and writing, and less on how “awesome” and “explosive” the action is.   Though not a particularly easy film to watch, Doubt is everything Hollywood has forgotten when it comes to good film making.

In addition, the actors bring an unbelievably flawless performance to the big screen.  Philip Seymour Hoffman and Meryl Streep were a match made in Heaven in how perfectly they execute their roles as well as Amy Adams delivering an equally moving performance.  If the cinematic presentation of the Broadway play is anything like the stage production, then Doubt might just be one of the best films ever made.

It’s not an easy film to watch however.  Every character has something undesirable about them, or is haunted by some tragic past that only makes the viewers weep.  Deception and lies permeate all throughout this movie, and with no happy ending in sight, all the viewers are left with in the end…is doubt.

Up!

Pixar is perfect!  I think anyone who knows me knows that I love Pixar.  And while Toy Story will always hold a special place in my heart, Up! contains everything I love in a story, movie, and any other form of storytelling.

It’s PG rating should let everyone know that it dives into much more mature and hard issues that not even grownups are always comfortable with confronting; issues of infertility, lost loved ones, and the inability to let go of one’s nostalgic sensibilities are evidence of this film’s “adult” nature.  But this is exactly the reason why Up! is a better story than the rest of the Pixar films.  (Not to knock them by any means, Pixar isn’t able to make a bad film in my opinion.

The film brought in some classic talents like Edward Asner and Christopher Plummer, both of whom represent a time period of film making that focused on fantastic story telling, imaginative places and ideas.  Up! will go down in history as one of the greatest animated films of all time.

The Dark Knight

Now just because I enjoy a good dialog driven film, doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate what a good action film can do to satisfy my cinematic needs.  The Dark Knight represents everything what not only an action film can and should be, but allows room for thinking and captivating story lines.

What I found most enjoyable was how closely it resembles what comics are like today.  They’re no longer a corny mesh of bad one-liners, but well written illustrated magazines made up of narrative artwork accompanied by dialogue and descriptive prose. (Shout out to you Jimmy Palmiotti!) The Dark Knight is the perfect representation of the modern comic book and helped to tear down those stereotypes that seem to trail behind the genre like an evil shadow.

But what the film did, other than create a new fan base, was take charge and make a statement that proclaimed the comic book film genre is worthy of praise and has the potential to make some of the greatest films in the modern age of movie making.

Heath Ledger brought the best interpretation of the Joker to the big screen and Director Christopher Nolan is continuing the Batman franchise with a new film installment.  I can only expect great things.

Lady In The Water

There aren’t that many modern films these days that present a fantasy tale without having a lot of wizard death rays and fiery pits of despair.  Lord of the Rings is great, and Harry Potter is freaking awesome, but every once in a while one needs a much more toned down story of the amazing and the fantastic.

Lady in the Water gives us that wonderfully fun and meaningful story that you’d find in any Dr. Seuss book, but with a terrifying twist.  And in that Shyamalan trademarked way, the twists and turns just keep coming, and not in the way you’d expect.

This fantastic tale from the director of the Sixth Sense goes out of his way to subtly poke fun at the critics and other writers who believe certain types of genres always have to follow a certain set of guidelines.  With a clever usage of the established characters within the film, Shyamalan shows that the hero of the story may in fact turn out to bear a much more unique and important role that you wouldn’t expect.

Plus, the film is worth seeing because of what happens to a certain film critic, mmwwaaa ha ha ha ha!!!

V for Vendetta

Alan Moore, one of the greatest and most influential writers within the comic book genre.  With three of his literary works already adapted to the big screen(The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, From Hell, and Watchmen…which was released after V) DC Comics took a chance and delivered this masterful piece of fiction to theaters everywhere.

Published in the early 80′s, (originally in black and white) V for Vendetta was a huge hit among comic book readers.  The clever use of the English language combined with the verbose and elegant vigilante was the perfect way to celebrate the forgotten memory of Guy Fox.  But it isn’t just the excellent writing from Alan Moore which made this film so successful, but also the brilliant execution from the director and team of movie makers.  Critics even praised the film for having portrayed some of the scenes from the Graphic Novel even more brilliantly on the big screen.

The film also does what I’m sure Alan Moore always intended it to do by showing that government should never be out their to control us, but rather to serve it’s people.  With the wavering trust issues that not only the American government has established amongst it’s people, but most governing bodies worldwide, this film hits right at home for those who feel that they can never truly trust their own country leaders.

True Grit

On to more recent films, True Grit was a pleasant and humorous change of pace in my cinematic endeavors.  I’ve really never been one who enjoys Westerns.  In fact, I down right HATE them!  And the only thing that makes a Western worse is by adding John Wayne to the casting call.

True Grit, however, took me by complete surprise!  It’s combination of wonderful acting, superb composition, editing, and musical scoring makes this film the best of 2010.

It’s one of those emotionally touching films that combines meaningful dialog with outstanding humor into one big blockbuster!  The King’s Speech was great, as were the rest of the nominees for best picture of 2010, but True Grit beat them by a landslide.

If you think about it, out of all the films that were nominated last year for best picture, which one are people truly going to remember years down the road?  Answer: True Grit.  Even my wonderful in laws who were sure not to enjoy this remake of the John Wayne classic, loved it…even more so than the original.

True Grit is one of those films that I will constantly pop back into the DVD player for years to come and enjoy more and more.

The Purple Rose of Cairo

Just like Up!, The Purple Rose of Cairo takes an unbelievable and unrealistic scenario and created an incredible story filled with fun and adventure!

Jeff Daniels delivers a memorable performance as a world traveler who appears only on film whose adventurous demeanor has an abused wife smitten on a daily basis as she goes to see the heroes movie every night.

Of course, like all imaginary tales, the fantastic happens and the movie’s hero steps out of the screen and into the real world, declaring his undying love for the women who comes to watch him every night.  So, the only question remains, how will the actor of this handsome adventurer react to his movie double walking around in real life?

It’s a film that doesn’t care about realism or believability.  The only aspect of this movie that audience members can relate to are the relationships that each characters share;  abusive relationships, yearning for a greater life, and how people react to nice vs. ugly personalities.  This is quite an underrated film and should be seen by everyone!  Besides, if you enjoyed Up!, you’ll enjoy the Purple Rose of Cairo!

My All Time Most Hated Movies!

The Blind Side

Why do I hate the Blind Side?  Because it’s no different from every other touchy feely movie out there about a black kid who’s run down on his luck only to be saved by a white family that seems to defy the cultural norms.  If I wanted to watch a film like “Radio”, well…I would have watched Radio!

Now the film does, in fact, remind me of my upbringing in the deep south surrounded by “in your face” white women whom you’d never want to piss off, and obviously segregated parts of town.  And maybe a part of me just really doesn’t want to relive that part of my life which could dictate my distaste for it.

The film is actually done well for what it is, but doesn’t really get my emotions boiling and caused me to barf with how over the top and ridiculously cliche is was.

Avatar

Sure, everyone can throw bricks at me and denounce my humanity for putting this movie on my most hated films list, but it’s true, I could have honestly lived without Avatar for the rest of my life.

I should probably make sure everyone knows that I didn’t actually hate the movie.  Being an artist myself and a lover of animated feature films, I wanted to be an animator for Disney (and later Pixar) for the longest time.  So I do have a tremendous appreciation for the work that went into making such a animated masterpiece.  But honestly, that’s all the film has going for it.

James Cameron, whom I despise as a director, basically opened up the Hollywood film vault and took as many stocked scripts as he could find and created this lackluster story line.  While the bulk of this movie pulls from Don Bluth’s very successful animated film “Fern Gully,” there’s also many hints of Disney’s Pocahontas, Dances with Wolves, and a barrage of typically Hollywood “save the day” cop out moments that are found in most children’s films.  I laughed through the majority of the movie, and dozed off when I wasn’t.

It’s fine that everyone else loves it, but I’m not sure I’ll really understand how a film this predictable and badly written can become such a cinematic phenomenon in the eyes of your average movie goer.  Oh well, I’ll just wait three more years when Avatar has been forgotten and film’s like Citizen Kane are still remembered.

Punisher: Warzone

Most films that I can’t stand typically have at least ONE thing that gives it some semblance of redemption.  The first Punisher film wasn’t a great movie, but it had that sense of angst that really kept me at the edge of my seat, not to mention the awesomely bad one liners delivered excellently by Thomas Jane.  Warzone, however, left me in a state of shock…there’s nothing redeeming about it at all… unless you enjoy terrible movies simply to laugh at them.

Warzone’s first problem begins with it’s purposeful disregard for the origin story establish in the first Punisher film.  Was this supposed to be a reboot?  Seriously!  how much do fans expect out of a superhero whose basis for existing is to enact vengeance on every bad guy by carrying around an arsenal of guns and knives?  Not much I guess as the well written Punisher didn’t live up to the Marvel Studios expectations and they had to make this barrage of explosions, bad special effects, and piss poor acting.

It almost felt as if the film was made by a bunch of kids fresh out of college who didn’t really pay attention in class.  I was almost like they took a light blue coke bottle and stuck it in front of the camera lens for a “dramatic” effect , only to be occasionally replace by a GREEN coke bottle.

The feeble attempts at being “artsy” come off more as a confusingly stupid comedy film that never intended for any laughs from it’s audience.

Moulin Rouge

I love musicals, but I was never able to get into Moulin Rouge.  It has some amazing acting in it plus some interesting and epic special effects, but the entire plot basis seemed quite strange to me.  Verging on being utterly boring, it took a chaotic and an off the wall approach to a story line that needed a much more toned down, orchestrated and classic feel.

This might be a little extreme, but the best way I could describe my distaste for the film would be motion sickness.  I found myself unable to focus on the more important details because of how quickly and abruptly the film pumped through the story with it’s flashy and chaotic tone, not to mention the random incoherent jargon that each actor continually spatted out with very little purpose behind them.

Of course, the story in and of itself is rather strange to begin with.  Chicago at least made the lifestyle of being famous and glamorous somewhat of a farce, (and was a Hell of a lot better musical) Moulin Rouge makes this story a little TOO serious, which is oddly intermingled with the out of place humor.

Some positives about the film are the very expertly choreographed musical numbers that were filled with enough energy to power my house for a next couple of years.  But other than that, the film has very little redeeming qualities about it.

Twilight

Gothic literature could never have had a WORSE addition to it’s genre.  The first mistake Stephanie Meyers makes is by attempting to put a dark and gothic set of emotionally deranged characters (because let’s face it, every single character is a bit emo, right?) into a trashy teen romance novel.  Buffy the Vampire Slayer at least kept the romance appropriate within the genre, Twilight just goes way over the top.

The next big mistake was by putting this story onto the big screen.  It’s bad enough that, in the books, Vampires are sparkly, lovey dovey emo duchbags that spend their nights stalking and hungering for the ones they “love”, now we get to actually SEE what this would be like if it were real.

I also have a real problem with stories that attempt to show how rape, murder, and being stalked are things that women “desire” out of their boyfriends.  Harry Potter did such an amazing job at getting young people (and adults too) to read stories with wonderful moral implications, twilight has simply negated everything J.K. Rowling established.

But of course, the worse part of the entire series is it’s terrible writing.  I know I’m not the greatest writer in the world, but I can still recognize bad literature when I see it; bad sentence structure, awful dialog, and odd scene transitions have all been applied from novel to big screen.  I guess I will always  have a film franchise to make fun of.

Release Date: June 28, 2011 (9pm in 3D and IMAX; 2D release: June 29)
Studio: Paramount Pictures
Director: Michael Bay
Screenwriter: Ehren Kruger
Starring: Shia LaBeouf, Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson, Kevin Dunn, Julie White, Frances McDormand, John Malkovich, Ken Jeong, Patrick Dempsey, Alan Tudyk, John Turturro, Leonard Nimoy
Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for intense prolonged sequences of sci-fi action violence, mayhem and destruction, and for language, some sexuality and innuendo)
Official Website: Transformersmovie.com

As everyone predicted…..

To put it bluntly, I’m left with only one real opinion of the third Transformers film installment, and it comes to you in the form of a mathematical equation.  It goes like this…..

This…

Plus This…

Plus This…

Equals This…

To be honest, Rosie Hunting really wasn’t as bad as the reviews would have you to believe.  She holds her own despite the fact that she only serves as one skinny piece of eye candy.  The problem with Rosie’s acting didn’t lie in her lack of talent, but rather with the poorly written script.  And just like with Natalie Portman in Star Wars, if the script is bad, so follows the acting.

Everyone understands that Michael Bay is the evil offspring of action movies; explosions, explosions, and more explosions coupled with random sex and skin exposing scenes that have very little to do with the plot is his trademark film making technique.  In fact, much of the film doesn’t actually make sense and the unnecessary character additions cause for and even bigger cluster fuck than I’m sure Mr. Bay was going for.

So Was There Anything Good?

Of course the film’s CGI technology was of a quality that would have James Cameron shaking in his boots.  But, as I’m sure many of you who know me already know, I don’t actually enjoy the Transformers movie franchise for it’s writing qualities.  The animation has always grabbed me and this third installment presents a new level of CGI quality never mastered by anyone else in the field.  The battle scenes were much more clear and precise and allowed me to differentiate between Decepticon and Autobot a TON better, and made for a realistic integration into the world of non CGI actors. However, even with the quality of animation and special effects, I still found myself snoozing away, especially during the last half hour of the film.

The most interesting aspect of the third Transformers film came at the beginning.  Bay used cleverly shot clips of actors playing presidents Nixon and Kennedy intermixed with actual footage from the historic day America first set foot on the moon. Much like X-Men, Transformers 3 uses actual historic events as a supplement for the films plotline.  In addition to being a very well planned alternative history lesson, this introduction help to solidify one very important aspect in America’s history…Nixon got to be apart of the coolest shit!

Well It Sounds Like The Movie had A Lot Of Potential

Once the opening sequence closes out, the film takes a quick and rocky decline into the pits of terrible film making with a shot of Rosie Huntington’s oiled ass walking up the steps of a cheap apartment owned by Sam Witwicky, played by Shia Lebeouf.  It’s within this scene that we get a glimpse of what is to come for the next 2 hours and 45 minutes.

As always, casting choices (both in the voice and live action varieties) for the movie are literally flawless.  If only the character choices were as good.  There were a few brief moments while watching the movie when I wondered if I had sat down in a Tardis and traveled to the future to the day of the next Muppet’s movie release.  It certainly felt like Jim Henson did most of the character designs.  The only thing this movie was missing were a few Fraggles and Miss Piggy jumping in with a final judo chop to Megatron’s metallic balls.  They would have at least been an improvement on the annoyingly ridiculous miniature autobots that wheeled around muttering stupid one-liner after one-liner.

As the film meandered around the explosions and sexual innuendos, I realized that the plot itself could have been summed up in under one hour, much like the previous two films.  What kept the movie going were the multiple action scenes. The third film presents nothing new and, in many instances, much of the seemingly powerful bits of oratory delivered by Optimus Primes can be found (in some shape or form) in films one and two.

As stated above, the last half hour of the film left me in a state of slumber…or least I wanted to sleep.  The noise from the multiple explosions prevented that.  I became so bored that even the parts of the movie I would have made fun of with my wife I didn’t bother smirking at.  I’m one of those snobbish movie goers who enjoys sitting through the credits, and I didn’t even bother sticking around as I was begging for the ending to come and get the Hell out of that seat which had caused my ass to ache with pain.  (And it still hurts!)

OK, So The Movie Flat Out Sucked Then

This is not a Transformers movie I will be purchasing come the DVD release date.  Sure, its special effects were top notch and, overall, had some great acting.  John Malkovich is the man!  But no amount of CGI mastery and acting talent could have saved this Michael Bay flop.

2 out of 10 stars

DCnU Promotional Video

Posted: July 3, 2011 in DCnU

Their enthusiasm has me a little more excited about what’s to come.  Though I wonder why Geoff Johns didn’t make his cameo in the video.

DCnU…What Titles Do I Want?!?!?

Posted: July 2, 2011 in DC Comics
Tags:

So, like most of DC’s loyal fans, I found myself upset and literally pissed off at the news that DC was pursuing the DCU reboot.  I know that’s not what they want to call it, but how else would you describe it?  I was unsure of how to take this.  At first I was ready to declare an complete boycott of DC Comics, which quickly changed into collecting the trades and an not individual issues.  As time as moved forward since that dreaded statement, my thoughts on the whole thing have changed almost daily.

Currently I’m at the “Intrigued” state of mind.  I’ve decided that for the titles I have a close, heartfelt connection too I will pick up on on weekly basis.  But there are still some titles I want to pick up, but haven’t decided which ones to pick up monthly, and which ones to wait on for the trade publications.

Below is a list of the titles that interest me and that I definitely want to read.  But I’m at a crossroads as to which ones to pick up weekly, and which ones I should patiently wait for to come out in trades.  I’ll be think about this for a while, but I could use some help.  Comment below and let me know what you think I should do. The ones with photos are the titles I’ve decided to pick up weekly for sure…

Action Comics #1, Grant Morrison, Rags Morales

Aquaman #1, Geoff Johns, Ivan Reis

Batgirl #1, Gail Simone, Ardian Syaf, Vicente Cifuentes

Batman #1, Scott Snyder, Greg Capullo

Batman and Robin #1, Peter Tomasi, Patrick Gleason

Batman: The Dark Knight #1, David Finch

Batwoman #1 , J.H. Williams III, Haden Blackman, Amy Reeder

Blue Beetle #1, Tony Bedard, Ig Guara, Ruy Jose

Catwoman #1, Judd Winick, Guillem March

Detective Comics #1, Tony Daniel

Flash #1, Brian Buccellato, Francis Manapul

Fury Of Firestorm #1, Gail Simone, Ethan Van Sciver

Green Lantern #1, Geoff Johns, Doug Mahnke, Christian Alamy

Green Lantern Corps #1, Peter Tomasi, Fernando Pasarin, Scott Hanna

I, Vampire #1, Josh Fialkov, Andrea Sorrentino

Justice League #1, Geoff Johns, Jim Lee

Justice League Dark #1, Peter Milligan, Mikel Janin

Justice League International #1, Dan Jurgens, Aaron Lopresti

Suicide Squad #1, Adam Glass, Marco Rudy

Supergirl #1, Michael Green, Mike Johnson, Mahmud A. Asrar

Superman #1, George Pérez, Jesus Merino

Swamp Thing #1, Scott Snyder, Yanick Paquette

Wonder Woman #1, Brian Azzarello, Cliff Chiang

This is too good NOT to post.  Please say you all laughed at merely the name of this product….