Archive for March, 2010

Release Date: March 26, 2010
Studio: DreamWorks Animation 
Director: Chris Sanders, Dean DeBlois 
Screenwriter: Dean DeBlois, Chris Sanders 
Starring: Jay Baruchel, Gerard Butler, America Ferrara, Jonah Hill, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, Craig Ferguson, Kristen Wiig, T.J. Miller 
Genre: Action, Adventure, Animation, Fantasy 
MPAA Rating: PG (for for sequences of intense action and some scary images, and brief mild language) 
Official Website: HowtoTrainYourDragon.com
When it comes to animated films, my unacceptability of predictable plotlines diminishes about 50%.  The target audience is obviously children, but with the current popularity of animated films among adults, a secondary audience is kept in mind during the screenwriting process.  To write a completely predictable script is good for the kids, but not so good for the adults. (Unless you like that sort of thing) In turn, something else must be added in order to meet the adult’s entertainment needs.  How to Train Your Dragon combines children and adult appeal for a unique and interesting approach to the typical dragon adventure tale.
The set up isn’t anything we are unfamiliar with.  We have our main character, Hiccup (who’s probably the same age as your middle school child who sat next to you)who doesn’t quite fit in much to the dismay of his father, Stoick who indecently is the leader of this Viking tribe.  Within a mere ten minute segment, we are shown Hiccup’s desire to achieve his father’s approval and to win over the acceptance of the whole tribe through a blood thirsty dragon battle in the village.  Hiccup’s adventure begins as he accidentally takes down the most feared dragon of all, a Night Furry.  Hiccup develops a relationship with this beast and begins to realize that the Viking hatred towards dragons is unfounded and begins his self-appointed task to show the rest of his Viking comrades the error of their ways.  Thus we have the tale of the outsider taking a stance against the norm and becoming the hero at the climax of the story.
Somewhere in the middle of the film, Hiccup claims to see a lot of himself in his new found dragon friend, whom he has named Toothless.  A series of events occurs to help support this claim where, ultimately, both characters have lost something which is essential to their mobility.  I wasn’t convinced in the actuality of Toothless and Hiccup being connected in this way; rather I saw it as Hiccup looking for something within the Night Fury that he could relate too.  Whether it be an actual relatable trait or something Hiccup unconsciously made up in his own mind is what I question.  Never the less, the point is still made clear that this film is all about facing yourself, or to coin the phrase “to face your dragons.”  Since Hiccup saw a lot of himself in Toothless, he sought a way to help the injured creature, which in turn gave him an unconscious reason to help himself.  The title, “How to Train your Dragon,” does not actually refer to the literal and the obvious.  This film is all about facing oneself and holding true to your moral convictions and your goals in life, despite the fact that everyone around you holds no faith in what you wish to achieve.  While this concept is quite over played in the cartoon movie world, it is portrayed better in this film than any animated film I’ve seen to date.
The animation quality in this film could be compared to that of Pixar. There was a definite attention to detail that DreamWorks Animation Studios has lacked in previous films.  The variety in atmospheres and landscapes was incredibly impressive as we went from a small hometown Viking village, to falling through forest landscapes,  flying through cloudy blue skies, sailing across beautiful oceanic scenery, and finally battling at a fiery volcanic island where plant life is replaced by rubble and ash.  The attention to those specific details went above and beyond what I’ve come to expect from a DreamWorks animated film.  But even on the much smaller scale, the attempt at making each and every dragon uniquely different was fantastically achieved.  There were dragons that resembled, fish, dogs, cats, insects and amphibians and this cannot be thrown out as an easy task, giving every featured dragon its own defining features and recognizable attributes, including specific voice inflections.  These detail oriented aspects of the dragons are clear cut reminders that each animal species is very diversified and unique in every way, while at the same time maintaining a unified set of instincts.
Now with all the greatness that this film brought to the screen, there was one minor distractions that made me chuckle.  Take for instance that no one had ever seen a Night Fury, yet for some reason the Vikings knew exactly what the creature looked like once Toothless appeared to them for the first time.  I thought back to Disney’s Beauty and the Beast during this moment, how in the world did they know the Beast lived up in the castle on the dark and gothic hill when that moment when Belle returned was the first they had heard of the Beast?  I can only assume that, like most fantasy tales, this is one of its unexplainable attributes that the audience is supposed to accept and forget about…but I can’t.
There was, of course, the very formulaic plot progression that I actually laid out for my wife prior to seeing the film, it’s that predictable.  This led to a conversation about the predictability of all feel-good, family oriented animated films which caused me to ask myself why I go see cartoon movies when I know exactly what’s going to happen.  The answer…it’s the animation.  Having grown up wanting to be a Disney or a Pixar artist/animation technician, the artistry of animated films is what grabs me.  This film did a masterful job at creating visually likeable characters, emotional and recognizable faces, beautiful sceneries, and amazing special effects.  The story itself was applied very well to the film, but the events throughout the story were annoyingly predictable.  It’s the artwork that is worth its weight in gold here.
Most dragon films have to deal with the simple fact that, due to their size, demeanor, and unrelatable characteristics, they aren’t the most successful films to be made.  Human characters have to be brought in that serve no purpose accept to be there for the climatic final battle with the “ultimate” dragon.  Even in the film “Dragon Heart,” there is an ineffective message due to the exceptionally difficult task of making a film about dragons.  “How to Train your Dragon” does something that no other dragon film has done before.  Despite the fact that the dragons cannot speak, this film gives the dragons a voice in the story.
Release Date: February 12, 2010 
Studio: 20th Century Fox 
Director: Chris Columbus 
Screenwriter: Craig Titley 
Starring: Logan Lerman, Brandon T. Jackson, Alexandra Daddario, Sean Bean, Pierce Brosnan, Steve Coogan, Rosario Dawson, Catherine Keener, Kevin McKidd, Joe Pantoliano, Uma Thurman, Ray Winstone 
Genre: Adventure, Fantasy 
MPAA Rating: PG (for action violence and peril, some scary images and suggestive material, and mild language) 
Official Website: PercyJacksonthemovie.com
We live in an era where popular novels are making their way to the big screen, more notably young-adult and children’s novels.  Harry Potter, Where the Wild Things Are, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, these and many more have shown that literature now has the capacity of doing well at the Hollywood level.  Are we at all surprised that the first novel in Rick Riordan’s five book series has become a cinematic franchise?
The film is directed by Chris Columbus, which, after seeing The Lightning Thief isn’t surprising since it has a familiar taste to his work on the first two Harry Potter films.  As with most films that feature children or young adults as the heroes and saviors of the human race, the story is set up where the Percy Jackson is introduced to a whole new world where he, much to his surprise, is known by all.  The film takes us through the motions where Percy comes to new realizations about himself, learns his father is Poseidon, and has a moment to impress the daughter of Aphrodite.  The event that triggers the action is when Percy discovers his mother to be in the clutches of Hades and is determined to rescue her.  With the help of a few friends Percy goes on a quest to find Hades, which causes them to run into Uma Thurman as Medusa and a few other daunting tasks along the way.  Needless to say, the adventure ends with a kind of, maybe, sort of, almost twist at the end where Percy delivers the coup de grace and saves the day.
I try to remind myself that this story was designed for young adults and I shouldn’t allow myself to become annoyed with certain plot devices and the film making techniques.  Never-the-less, I find myself unable to move past many of the film’s aspects and second-rate innovations.
I have not read any of the Percy Jackson novels so I can’t speak to how well the novel transitions to the screen.  However, if the dialogue in the film is anything like that in the book, I might end up shooting myself in the face!  The majority of the script involves very dry conversations that don’t assist in developing the characters purpose in the story.  Sure we as an audience still learn about the characters and the film still pushes forward very well, but not because of the intelligent use of dialogue.  I’m sure most of the youth in the theater will find it “awesome” or “sweet” or “cool” seeing as how there are a lot of “awesomes” and “sweets” and “cools” verbalized throughout the duration of the film.  The script also falls into the literary trap of making the twists and turns of the story painfully obvious.  I knew who the real villain was before Percy ventured out to find Hades.  Thanks Craig Titley!
Now for you more educated film going adults, please don’t be surprised if you begin to question whether or not you’re in the right auditorium.  No, you are not about to see High School Musical, or any other film where the kids seem like they will break out into song at any given moment.  It does makes sense seeing every major character in the film as gorgeous or flawless since they are the children of the gods, but there is that hint of “perfection” as far as how attractive the actors and actresses are.  Don’t be surprised if your twelve year old boy thinks this is the best movie ever because “Annabeth (daughter of Aphrodite) is friggin hot!”
For the parents out there who are concerned that this film will be too violent for your children, fear not!  Yes the film contains battle scenes where Percy must fend off monsters, ghouls, demons and other mythological creatures of Greece, but the animation will make you laugh more than worry if your child’s eyes are covered during the “violent” scenes.  With the advancements in CGI technology and the popularity of the books among children today, you’d think Riordan would have received plenty of funds to deliver top quality CGI effects.  But in most cases you’ll be able to recognize the difference between the natural landscapes, and green screen technology.  But if you are still concerned with any inappropriate innuendos from the film, possibly sexual ones, please stay calm.  The furthest the film gets at suggestive sexual relations is after Grover, a satyr, returns from the hands of Persephone with a big smile on his face and horns on his head of which he is quite proud of.
The one scene that I cannot deny to be one of the greatest moments in film history is the encounter with Medusa, AKA Uma Thurman.  I used to hate this actress until she appeared in Kill Bill films, then I discovered a completely new and artsy side of the actress I had never seen before.  I’m disappointed in the fact that she was only given approximately a fifteen minute segment.  Without a doubt, she mopped the floor with the other performers and stole the show!
As much as I’m hating on the film, overall, the movie was entertaining.  Despite its animated flaws, casting choices, and poorly adapted screenplay, the film did keep my attention.  However, that could possibly be due to my personal bias towards the mythological and Sci/Fi genres.  If you are anything like me, you will hate and love this movie at the same time.  But truth be told, your kids will probably love it!
Release Date: November 20, 2009 
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures 
Director: John Lee Hancock 
Screenwriter: John Lee Hancock 
Starring: Sandra Bullock, Tim McGraw, Kathy Bates, Quinton Aaron, Lily Collins, Jae Head 
Genre: Drama, Sports 
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for one scene involving brief violence, drug and sexual references) 
Official Website: TheBlindSidemovie.com
One thing to keep in mind when it comes to film and the experience that comes along with it is the rhetoric behind the story.  How are the film makers using rhetoric to appeal to the senses? What is the director and writer’s purpose in the literary and visual side of things?  What type of audience is the film attempting to reach out too with the performances, musical output, and artistic deliverance?  The answers to these kinds of questions are tunneling through my mind as I look back on the Blind Side and how it affected me personally.  I am then at a cinematic stand still where the emotional impact has very little effect on me because of the rhetorical approach the film takes, in which case I find myself at a stalemate of the films quality.
I entered into the theater late where, according to the ticket booth cashier, I was stuck with only a ten seat selection seeing as how this showing was almost sold out.  I walked into a dark auditorium with the light illuminating off of the white, middle class representatives of Ft. Collins, Colorado.  I was already in the mist of a crowd who were ready to see a story about a misfortuned black kid whose life was change by the good deeds of a white family.  The twists and turns their intertwined lives take give new meaning to the personalities and portray the rest of the world as selfish and a self-absorbed social class who feel they have a monopoly on life and how it should be run.
I do not mean to imply that the emotional aspects of the film are invalid or uninspiring; however the films rhetorical approaches are quite manipulative and predictable.  Here we have a middle class white family who has adopted a down on his luck black boy in hopes to change his life, where the rest of the world disapproves in the beginning but later love both the boy and the family.  (If you haven’t seen this plot device before, then you haven’t seen a lot of movies.)  This is the story of many in which directors have capitalized on and made millions because of it.  It is obvious that the film was molded to meet a certain standard that the majority of movie goers will love and accept the film as inspiring and wonderful, which causes them to believe this to be one of the year’s best films.  And as the film maintains a sense of craftsmanship and film making artistry, it remains in the typical film “feel-good” genre and produces a “hollywoodized” version of a very sad and emotional true story.
The acting was in between good and great, with Kathy Bates out shinning all of her acting peers. Sandra Bullock delivers a performance very reminiscent of the typical southern house wife who is very caring and loving, but with a very boastful and a doesn’t-take-shit-from-anyone attitude.  (She reminds me of most of the women in my family actually.)  Tim McGraw, while only a minor character, gives an accurate depiction of a southern male who takes a very laid back approach to most things in life, in addition to the masterful performance provided by Kathy Bates whose acting talents were limited only by the lack of screen time in comparison to the mainline actors.  And while I do believe Sandra Bullock to have delivered a top notch performance, she does not touch Meryl Streep!
The film did seem to run rather long but did not feel contrived.  The films flow and editing qualities were quite good and the use of camera angles were “safely” well done.  The film follows the same film making techniques that go along with the rhetorical and manipulative story telling aspect.  Along with making the life of the middle class beautiful and gorgeously inspiring, (props given to the musical composer for aiding in the amplification of that emotional depiction) we also see the “dark” side of the city which, coincidentally, is filled with dark people.  A very prejudice approach, even if the film makers didn’t realize it.

While most of this review is hung on the negative side of things, I did enjoy certain aspects of the film.  The humor will make you laugh and roll your eyes in a positive way.  But the film’s approach at presenting one side of the story is annoyingly obvious and in the “Hollywood” tradition.  The story itself is a terrible tragedy met with an inspiring ending, but the film goes about telling it predictably and manipulatively.